English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/94733
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGraff, J. de-
dc.contributor.authorAklilu, A.-
dc.contributor.authorOuessar, Mohamed-
dc.contributor.authorAsins Velis, Sabina-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-02T10:24:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-02T10:24:16Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy 32: 165-174 (2013)-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/94733-
dc.description.abstractSince the 1930s there has been worldwide concern about the effects and impacts of land degradation. After the problems experienced in the Dust Bowl in the USA, much attention was paid to soil and water conservation in both developed and developing countries. Initially Governments stimulated the establishment of physical control measures, such as terraces, check dams and reforestation. This was achieved through top-down regulations, and Forestry Departments were often in charge of the implementation. Subsequently the measures were implemented through more specialized agencies, and later with incentives, such as food aid in developing countries and subsidies in developed countries. In some cases farmers were mobilized to work together on the establishment of the conservation measures. Because of the low success rate of this top-down approach with line interventions, it was realized that a more participatory approach had to be followed. The emphasis then shifted to area interventions such as cover crops, mulching and composting. In some countries voluntary ways of collaboration between farmers were developed. More recently Conservation Agriculture has become popular, focusing on less soil disturbance, continuous land cover and crop rotations. This paper analyses whether and to what extent countries have followed such general trends in their soil and water conservation policies (since the 1990s often referred to as sustainable land management) or whether countries have also followed their own specific strategies. A historical (1960-2010) and comparative analysis of the development of these sustainable land management policies and practices is undertaken in five selected countries: Indonesia, Ethiopia, Tunisia, Spain and Bolivia. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectLand use practices-
dc.subjectStrategies-
dc.subjectInstitutions-
dc.subjectPolicies-
dc.subjectSustainable land management-
dc.subjectSoil and water conservation-
dc.titleThe development of soil and water conservation policies and practices in five selected countries from 1960 to 2010-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.018-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.018-
dc.date.updated2014-04-02T10:24:17Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
Appears in Collections:(CIDE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.