English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/94228
Compartir / Impacto:
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 6 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)

Branch age and diameter: useful criteria for recognising woodland management in the present and past?

Autor Out, Welmoed A. ; Vermeeren, Caroline; Hänninen, Kirsti
Palabras clave Woodland management
Diameter selection
Branch growth rings
Age/diameter analysis
Archaeological wood
Fecha de publicación 2013
Citación Journal of Archaeological Science (40/11) : 4083–4097 (2013)
ResumenWhen prehistoric archaeological sites yield non-carbonised wood, one of the ways to test for management practices consisting of pollarding and coppicing is analysis of branch diameter and age. However, the interpretation of such data is often based on assumptions. To test whether it is in fact possible to identify past woodland management on the basis of age/diameter analysis in archaeological wood assemblages, this paper presents models that predict the expected age and diameter distribution of branches from unmanaged and managed trees. The models have been tested using data on modern-day Alnus glutinosa, Fraxinus excelsior and species of the genus Salix. Branches of modern-day unmanaged and managed trees with a diameter up to approx. 2 cm (not an absolute limit) have a comparable age. Branches with a diameter of approx. 2–6 cm from unmanaged trees are older than similar branches from managed trees. The age distribution in the latter also ends abruptly. The age/diameter data from the modern-day trees indicate that the models can be used to discern management in the past, if branches up to approx. 2 cm in diameter are avoided and if, critically, taxon, sample size, growing conditions, natural disturbance/opportunistic wood collection and the possibility of diameter selection are taken into account. Archaeological datasets mainly from prehistoric sites are then reinterpreted by means of comparison with the models. Indications of management in prehistory as demonstrated by age/diameter are scarce but available. There is thus a clear need for further research in this field. Practical suggestions are provided for improving the quality of future research on woodland management practices by means of branch age/diameter analysis
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.004
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/94228
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMF) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Accés Restringit Digital.CSIC.pdf21,67 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Mostrar el registro completo

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.