English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/93028
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Noninvasive diagnosis of hypolactasia with 4-galactosylxylose (gaxilose): A multicentre, open-label, phase IIB-III nonrandomized trial

AuthorsAragón, Juan J. ; Hermida, Carmen; Martínez-Costa, Oscar H. ; Sánchez, Valentina; Codoceo, Rosa; Cano, Amparo ; Fernández-Mayoralas, Alfonso
Issue Date2014
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
CitationJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology 48(1): 29-36 (2014)
Abstract[Goals and Background]: Hypolactasia affects over half of the world population. Diagnosis remains problematic as currently available tests, such as the hydrogen breath test, have low reliability and lactose intolerance symptoms are unspecific. We evaluated the diagnostic performance and safety of a new noninvasive diagnostic test based on urine or serum measurement of D-xylose after lactase cleavage of orally administered 4-galactosylxylose (gaxilose). [Study]: In a multicentre, open-label, nonrandomized, phase IIb-III study, consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of lactose intolerance sequentially underwent intestinal biopsy for direct measurement of lactase activity (reference standard), hydrogen breath test, and blood glucose test after lactose challenge, 4-and 5-hour urine-based gaxilose test, and blood-based gaxilose test. For the gaxilose tests, 0 to 4 and 4 to 5 hours urine samples were taken after a 0.45 g gaxilose dose, whereas serum samples were taken 90 minutes after a 2.7 g dose for D-xylose determination. Genetic testing of hypolactasia was also assessed. [Results]: Of the 222 patients enrolled, 203 completed all diagnostic tests; 108 were hypolactasic according to biopsy. The sensitivities and specificities and positive and negative predictive values of the gaxilose tests were all >90% versus 69% to 85% for the hydrogen breath test and the blood glucose test. The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for the gaxilose tests (>0.9, P≤0.007). These tests also had higher sensitivity than genetic testing for hypolactasia and were well tolerated. [Conclusions]: The diagnostic performance of the gaxilose tests is excellent and can substantially improve the diagnosis of hypolactasia.
Descriptionet al.
Identifiersdoi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318297fb10
issn: 0192-0790
e-issn: 1539-2031
Appears in Collections:(IQOG) Artículos
(IIBM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.