English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9295
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Indeterminacy of Translation as a Hermeneutic Doctrine

Autor Peña, Lorenzo
Palabras clave Quine, Willard Van Orman
Indeterminación de la traducción
Interpretación, Hermenéutica
Indeterminacy of translation
Interpretation
Hermeneutics
Fecha de publicación 1988
EditorAmerican Catholic Philosophical Association
ResumenQuine's Indeterminacy of Translation thesis is grounded in language-verificationism -- the claim that language contains no unverifiable relation. Quine's thesis issues in a hermeneutic doctrine to the effect that exegetical disputes are empty, any construal's correctness depending on the choice of a translation manual alone. Gadamer, on the other hand, maintains that a sense is bestowed upon a text by the interpreter's understanding horizon, the comprehension thus secured amounting to a merging of horizons. Translation, according to Gadamer, is to be conceived as a recreation (Nachbildung). While there are differences between Quine's and Gadamer' s views, I emphasize their deep agreements. They both are in the end committed to embrace sense-relativism and so to regard clashing interpretations as correct upon adequate choices. That relativism is found fault with; for it entails that philosophical deliberation is futile, insomuch as a philosophical system can be construed in such a way as to be equivalent to another, when what was going on was pondering on which of them, if any, was true. The paper concludes by rejecting the assumptions Quine's and Gadamer's hermeneutic doctrines of sense-indeterminacy are based on
Descripción En: Hermeneutics and the Tradition compilado por Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Washington: American Catholic Philosophical Association, 1988, pp. 212-24.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9295
ISBN 0-918090-22-9
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IFS) Libros y partes de libros
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
indeterm.pdf49,8 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.