English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9086
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Estimating accidental coincidences for pixelated PET detectors and singles list-mode acquisition

AuthorsRafecas López, Magdalena ; Torres Espallardo, Irene ; Spanoudaki, V.; McElroy, D. P.; Ziegler, S. I.
KeywordsPositron emission tomography (PET)
Small animal
Random estimation
Pixelated detectors
Inter-crystal scatter
Issue Date1-Feb-2007
PublisherElsevier
CitationNuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A - Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 571(1-2): 285-288 (2007)
AbstractWe have studied the validity of random estimation techniques for various low energy thresholds (LETs) and single list-mode data sets in small animal PET. While a LET below 255 keV helps to increase the sensitivity, it also results in an increase of random coincidences and inter-crystal scatter (ICS). The study is carried out for MADPET-II, a dual-layer positron emission tomography (PET) scanner prototype consisting of LSO crystals read out individually by APDs. The data are acquired in singles list-mode format, and coincidences are computed post-acquisition. To estimate randoms, we have used the delayed coincidence window method (DW), and the singles rate model (SR). Various phantoms were simulated using GATE. For LETs under 255 keV, the number of random events R, estimated using the SR and the DW methods, is larger than the number of randoms which was directly computed from GATE simulations, and R(SR) > R(DW) > R(GATE). The higher the LET, the smaller the overestimation. For LETs > 255 keV, R(DW)/R(GATE) approximate to 1. If scattered singles were excluded from the file, this discrepancy between R(DW or SR) and R(GATE) significantly diminished. This fact points out to ICS as the effect responsible for the mismatch, since for LETs lower than 255 keV, all singles related to an ICS event can be detected independently, thus altering the singles rate. Therefore, if low LETs are used, random estimation techniques should account for ICS. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description4 pages, 1 figure.-- PACS nrs.: 87.57.Fg; 87.64.Aa; 87.53.Wz.-- ISI Article Identifier: 000244599100069
Online version available 10 November 2006.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.084
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/9086
DOI10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.084
ISSN0168-9002
Appears in Collections:(IFIC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.