English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/90624
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 22 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Effects of geolocators on reproductive performance and annual return rates of a migratory songbird

Autor Gómez, Jesús; Michelson Chantel, I.; Bradley, David W. Ryan Norris, D.; Berzins, L. L.; Dawson, R. D.; Clark, R. G.
Fecha de publicación 2014
EditorBlackwell Publishing
Citación JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY 155: 37- 44 (2014)
ResumenOur understanding of the annual life-cycle movements of small migratory birds has advanced rapidly with the advent of light-weight geographical positioning devices (i.e., geolocators), yet the effects of geolocators on reproduction and survival have not been adequately quantified. We tested for impacts of attaching a 1-g geolocator (using a harness around the legs and back, anterior to the tail) to adult Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) on parental feeding behavior, nestling growth and size, fledging success, and return rates between 2011 and 2012. At one breeding site, we compared feeding visits, nestling growth, and nestling size between paired nest boxes where one parent was marked at the 'geolocator' box with a 'control' nest box where neither parent was marked. We detected no differences between geolocator and control nests in either the frequency of feeding visits to nestlings or the amount of time spent at nests. Birds marked with geolocators fed nestlings as frequently as their unmarked mates. Likewise, nestlings raised at geolocator nests grew at similar rates to those at control nests, and had similar structural size and body mass at fledging. At three widely-separated sites across the Tree Swallow breeding range in Canada, we also found that fledging success was similar for geolocator and control nests. Although we found no evidence for short-term negative impacts of geolocators, the return rates of geolocator-marked Tree Swallows tended to be significantly lower than those of unmarked control birds. Thus, we found little evidence for short-term impacts of geolocators on reproduction but our study does suggest that long-term impacts of geolocators could be manifested in terms of lower survival, higher emigration rates, or lower breeding propensity. © 2013 Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/90624
DOI10.1007/s10336-013-0984-x
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1007/s10336-013-0984-x
issn: 0021-8375
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Gómez_2014_Effects of geolocators_J of Ornithology-1.pdf251,52 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.