English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/89540
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

‘Bodyguard’ plants: Predator-escape performance influences microhabitat choice by nightjars

AuthorsCamacho, Carlos
KeywordsAntipredator behaviour
Caprimulgidae
Habitat selection
Microhabitat
Predation risk
Red-necked nightjar
Issue Date2014
PublisherElsevier
CitationBehavioural Processes, 103: 145-149 (2014)
AbstractPrey are typically assumed to avoid their predators. However, habitat selection patterns of prey might depend upon their ability to use particular landscape elements to manage their escape options from predator encounters. During two breeding seasons, I studied habitat use and behaviour of red-necked nightjars (Caprimulgus ruficollis) foraging under the risk of predation by red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in southwestern Spain. Nightjars exhibited nearly invariable foraging site choice and body positioning behaviour based on the architecture of vegetation near foraging sites. Nightjars actively chose to sit <50 cm from >120 cm-tall shrubs or trees while facing away from vegetation cover. Vegetation behind nightjars significantly increased their aerial escape opportunities from terrestrial attacks during their peak activity period, when nightjars reveal visible feather bands during their foraging sallies from the ground and their cryptic colouration may not always match the background. Spatial overlap of nightjars and foxes along roads suggests that microhabitat selection by these birds may in part depend on the chance of escape from predator encounters rather than on the probability of encountering predators. I conclude that the interplay between high escape efficiency and visibility have probably contributed to the evolution of foraging site selection by caprimulgids using bare grounds and cattle, horse and camel trails as the natural counterpart of roads.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.007
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/89540
DOI10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.007
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bodyguard Plants BEPROC REVIEWED.pdf125,18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.