Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8778
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Comparing laser ray tracing, spatially resolved refractometer and Hartmann-Shack sensor to measure the ocular wave aberration |
Autor: | Moreno Barriuso, Esther CSIC; Marcos, Susana CSIC ORCID ; Navarro, Rafael CSIC ORCID; Burns, Stephen A. | Palabras clave: | Ocular aberrations Laser ray tracing Hartmann-Shack Spatially resolved refractometer Aberrometer |
Fecha de publicación: | mar-2001 | Editor: | American Academy of Optometry Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Citación: | Optometry and Vision Science 78(3): 152-156 (2001) | Resumen: | [Purpose] To compare quantitatively three techniques to measure the optical aberrations of the human eye: laser ray tracing (LRT), the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (H-S), and the spatially resolved refractometer (SRR). LRT and H-S are objective imaging techniques, whereas SRR is psychophysical. [Methods] Wave aberrations were measured in two normal subjects with all three techniques implemented in two different laboratories. [Results] We compared the experimental variability of the results obtained with each technique with the overall variability across the three methods. For the two subjects measured (RMS wavefront error 0.5 μm and 0.9 μm, respectively), we found a close agreement; the average standard deviation of the Zernike coefficients within a given method was 0.07 μm, whereas the average global standard deviation across techniques was 0.09 μm, which is only slightly higher. [Conclusions] There is a close match between the Zernike coefficients obtained by LRT, H-S, and SRR. Thus, all three techniques provide similar information concerning wave aberration when applied to normal human eyes. However, the methods are operationally different, and each has advantages and disadvantages depending on the particular application. |
Descripción: | 5 pages, 3 figures.-- PMID: 11327676 [PubMed]. | Versión del editor: | http://www.optvissci.com/pt/re/ovs/abstract.00006324-200103000-00007.htm | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8778 | ISSN: | 1040-5488 | E-ISSN: | 1538-9235 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CFMAC-IO) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comparing_laser_ray_tracing_OVS.pdf | 226,54 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
432
checked on 27-mar-2024
Download(s)
1.131
checked on 27-mar-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.