English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8720
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Comparison of Three Operative Models for Estimating the Surface Water Deficit Using ASTER Reflective and Thermal Data

Autor García García, Mónica; Villagarcía, Luis; Contreras, Sergio; Domingo, Francisco ; Puigdefábregas, Juan
Palabras clave ASTER
Evapotranspiration
Surface energy balance
Semiarid
Fecha de publicación 6-jun-2007
EditorMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citación Sensors 7: 860-883 (2007)
ResumenThree operative models with minimum input data requirements for estimating the partition of available surface energy into sensible and latent heat flux using ASTER data have been evaluated in a semiarid area in SE Spain. The non-evaporative fraction (NEF) is proposed as an indicator of the surface water deficit. The best results were achieved with NEF estimated using the "Simplified relationship" for unstable conditions (NEF_Seguin) and with the S-SEBI (Simplified Surface Energy Balance Index) model corrected for atmospheric conditions (NEF_S-SEBIt,) which both produced equivalent results. However, results with a third model, NEF_Carlson, that estimates the exchange coefficient for sensible heat transfer from NDVI, were unrealistic for sites with scarce vegetation cover. These results are very promising for an operative monitoring of the surface water deficit, as validation with field data shows reasonable errors, within those reported in the literature (RMSE were 0.18 and 0.11 for the NEF, and 29.12 Wm-2 and 25.97 Wm-2 for sensible heat flux, with the Seguin and S-SEBIt models, respectively).
Descripción 24 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables.-- Special Issue "Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment".
Versión del editorhttp://www.mdpi.org/sensors/specialissues/remote-sensing-sensors.htm
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8720
ISSN1424-8220
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEZA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Comparison_three_operative_models.pdf2,63 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.