English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/85911
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeindorf, David C.-
dc.contributor.authorHerrero Isern, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda del Álamo, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorBakr, Noura-
dc.contributor.authorSwanhart, Samantha-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-11T08:47:00Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-11T08:47:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-
dc.identifier.citationWeindorf DC, Herrero J, Castañeda C, Bakr N, Swanhart S. Direct soil gypsum quantification via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 77 (6): 2071-2077 (2013)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0361-5995-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/85911-
dc.description7 Pags., 6 Figs., 4 Tabls.es_ES
dc.description.abstractSoil scientists have long struggled with an effective method for quantifying gypsum content in soils. Several methods exist, but each is fraught with problems. Recent enhancements to portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) spectrometers have provided better detection limits especially for lighter elements such as S, a key component of gypsum. Thus, this research aimed to test the effectiveness of PXRF as a means of directly quantifying gypsum in soils. A total of 102 soil samples containing a wide variety of gypsum (∼2–95%) were subjected to both traditional laboratory analysis (thermogravimetry) and elemental analysis via PXRF. Simple linear regression and multiple linear regression were used to establish the relationship between the two datasets. Log transformation of some datasets was necessary to normalize the data. Using simple linear regression for Ca, laboratory data and PXRF Ca data produced an R2 of 0.8794. Similarly, simple linear regression for laboratory-quantified gypsum vs. PXRF S produced an R2 of 0.9120. Multiple linear regression of laboratory quantified gypsum vs. both PXRF S and Ca produced an R2 of 0.9127. No significant differences were observed between model generation and validation datasets. Overall, PXRF shows great promise for the direct quantification of gypsum in soils.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipField and lab works in Spain were funded by the Spanish Government through the project AGL2012-40100. The contract of C. Castañeda is co-funded by ESF.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSoil Science Society of Americaes_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.titleDirect soil gypsum quantification via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometryes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.2136/sssaj2013.05.0170-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.05.0170es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1435-0661-
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
mod vers.aut pend.pdf20,83 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.