English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8583
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 67 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Crystalline lens radii of curvature from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging

Autor Rosales, Patricia; Dubbelman, Michiel; Marcos, Susana ; Van der Heijde, Rob
Palabras clave Crystalline lens
Scheimpflug
Purkinje
Radii of curvature
Phakometry
Accommodation
Fecha de publicación 19-sep-2006
EditorAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Citación Journal of Vision 6(10): 1057-1067 (2006)
ResumenWe present a comparison between measurements of the radius of the anterior and posterior lens surface, which was performed using corrected Scheimpflug imaging and Purkinje imaging in the same group of participants (46 for the anterior lens, and 34 for the posterior lens). Comparisons were also made as a function of accommodation (0 to 7 D) in a subset of 11 eyes. Data were captured and processed using laboratory prototypes and custom processing algorithms [for optical and geometrical distortion correction in the Scheimpflug system and using either equivalent mirror (EM) or merit function (MF) methods for Purkinje].
We found statistically significant differences in 4 of 46 eyes for the anterior lens radius, and 10 of 34 eyes for the posterior radius (using the MF and individual biometric data to process the Purkinje images). For the anterior lens, the agreement increases using individual biometry as opposed to biometric data from a model eye. For the posterior lens, the agreement increases using the MF as opposed to the EM method. For the changes during accommodation, no significant difference between the two techniques was found.
In conclusion, the results of the cross-validation using the Scheimpflug and Purkinje imaging technique show that both techniques provide comparable lens radii and similar changes with accommodation. Purkinje tends to overestimate posterior lens radius, whereas pupil size limits the acquisition of posterior lens data with the Scheimpflug camera. Computer simulations using the Scheimpflug data as input show that the consistent slight overestimation of the posterior lens radius using Purkinje imaging can be partly attributed to the asphericity of the lens surface.
Descripción 11 pages, 5 figures.-- PMID: 17132077 [PubMed].
Versión del editorhttp://journalofvision.org/6/10/5/
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/8583
DOI10.1167/6.10.5
ISSN1534-7362
Aparece en las colecciones: (CFMAC-IO) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Rosales-2006-jov-6-10-5.pdf830,34 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.