English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/85624
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

AuthorsLeung, Brian; Roura-Pascual, N.; Bacher, Sven; Heikkilä, J.; Brotons, Lluís; Burgman, Mark A.; Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Essl, Franz; Hulme, Philip E.; Richardson, David M.; Sol, Daniel; Vilà, Montserrat
KeywordsColonisation
Exotic
Habitat suitability
life-history traits
Non-indigenous
Policy
Propagule pressure
Risk analysis
Species distribution
Uncertainty
Issue Date2013
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationEcology Letters, 16: 1415-e16 (2013)
AbstractWe address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12172
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/85624
DOI10.1111/ele.12172
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ele12172.pdf51,45 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.