English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/85062
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Ponce, Estela-
dc.contributor.authorGómez Macpherson, H.-
dc.contributor.authorDiallo, Oumar-
dc.contributor.authorDjibril, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBaba, C.-
dc.contributor.authorPorcel, O.-
dc.contributor.authorMathieu, B.-
dc.contributor.authorComas, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorMateos, Luciano-
dc.contributor.authorConnor, David J.-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.009-
dc.identifierissn: 0308-521X-
dc.identifier.citationAgricultural Systems 115: 72-82 (2013)-
dc.description.abstractIn Mauritania, most irrigated land was designed for, and remains devoted to, rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. Decades after introduction, however, yield remains below expectations, irrigated land is gradually being abandoned, and now crop diversification is promoted to improve sustainability of irrigated agriculture. This paper presents evidence of the potential, and limitations, of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cropping in small-holder irrigation schemes along the Mauritanian side of the Senegal River Valley. Results are based on 3-years of on-farm participatory research (2007-2009) carried out at five irrigation schemes in collaboration with farmers and national research and extension services. Grain yield, water productivity and gross margin of sorghum and rice were compared at plot level. Global average grain yield over years and schemes was 2.5tha-1 for sorghum, ranging from 1.7tha-1 to 3.2tha-1, compared to 5.6tha-1 for rice, ranging from 4.0tha-1 to 7.3tha-1, even though both crops had similar total above-ground biomass at maturity. Sorghum required less irrigation water than rice (435 vs. 601mm) but the smaller yield resulted in similar irrigation water productivity (0.87 vs. 0.96kgm-3) and fuel (pumping) productivity (1.71 vs. 1.93kgMJ-1). Despite smaller yields, however, sorghum profitability was significantly greater than rice (1172 vs. 788 € ha-1), due to higher market price and, in the case of one scheme, lower irrigation costs. Main constraints identified in sorghum cropping were (i) poor crop establishment because of late sowing and water logging; (ii) neglected weed management; and (iii) mismatch between irrigation delivery schedules and water requirements. The causes of these constraints are particularities of rice production systems (design and heavy soil) and farmers' habits acquired with traditional rainfed sorghum cropping during the wet season.The analyses presented here reveal that sorghum cropping is a profitable option to rice for small-holder farmers, particularly on light-textured soils within the irrigation schemes. Furthermore, large variability of results among sorghum farmers and the high above-ground biomass at maturity suggests scope for improving grain yield and water productivity. Challenges remain, however, for adoption of sorghum in irrigated agriculture in Mauritania. National agricultural policies must ensure access to credit and agricultural inputs (seeds and fertilizers) and consider specific requirements for crop diversification (type of soil, irrigation distribution) in both rehabilitation of existing schemes and in design and construction of new ones. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development and the Ministry of Rural Development in Mauritania.-
dc.titleContribution of sorghum to productivity of small-holder irrigation schemes: On-farm research in the Senegal River Valley, Mauritania-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.