English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/81732
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

A futurist perspective on the Anthropocene

AuthorsRull, Valentí
KeywordsAnthropocene
Chronology
Chronostratigraphy
Holocene
Human impact
Industrialization
Issue Date24-Apr-2013
PublisherSage Publications
CitationThe Holocene 23(8) :1198-1201 (2013)
AbstractAn important feature of the ongoing debate about the acceptance of the Anthropocene as a formal chronostratigraphic unit with the same rank as the Holocene (epoch) has been either the existence or the lack of a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP). In addition, the utility of the Anthropocene as a stratigraphic unit has also been questioned. In this paper, it is proposed that the discovery of the GSSP may not be a major problem and could only be a matter of time. However, the term Anthropocene itself, defined on the basis of the stratigraphic expression of human activities (e.g. large-scale agriculture and land clearance, accelerated release of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere) may significantly impact the current stratigraphic framework guided by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). Indeed, the formal usage of this term can not only lead to stratigraphic and terminological inconsistencies but can also influence the future development of the established chronostratigraphic scheme. These points should be considered by the ICS Anthropocene Working Group before making a final decision. The stratigraphic status of the Anthropocene, however, is a formal issue that should not affect current and future research on human-induced environmental and sedimentary changes, including their stratigraphic imprint. The message is twofold: leave the formal chronostratigraphic aspects to the ICS, and keep producing and organizing knowledge independently of the formal debate. Doing so would require the development of a parallel and likely transitory chronological system without formal stratigraphic value, from which the term Anthropocene would be, at least temporarily, excluded.
Description4 p. -- Post-print del artículo publicado en The Holocene. Versión revisada y corregida.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/81732
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959683613483628
ISSN0959-6836
E-ISSN1198-1201
Appears in Collections:(IBB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
futurist_perspective_anthropocene_postprint.pdf282,06 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.