English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/80432
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Questioning the mutual benefits of myrmecochory: a stable isotope-based experimental approach

AuthorsCaut, Stéphane ; Jowers, Michael J.; Cerdá, Xim ; Boulay, Raphaël
KeywordsAphaenogaster senilis
Helleborus foetidus
Nutrient transfer
Sex allocation
Stable isotopes
Issue Date2013
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
CitationEcological entomology, 38(4): 390-399 (2013)
AbstractMutualisms play a key part in ecological systems and drive the evolution of much of the world's biological diversity. Among them, myrmecochory, seed dispersal by ants, is a worldwide mechanism throughout many ecosystems. However, the classic representation of myrmechocory as a mutualism could be put into question if one of the two players did not garner a real advantage. A controlled diet experiment was conducted in which ants were given five diets (supplemented or not with elaiosomes). First, using an ant-seed mutualism system, the aim was to understand if elaiosome consumption could modify reproductive output and sex allocation. Second, nitrogen isotopic values were used as a nutrient tracer in the brood to estimate the consumption and selection of elaiosome in comparison to other diets. A significant difference was found in the production of pupae between some diets, but pupae production was not linked to the elaiosome supplementation. Repartitions between pupa type and the effect of the diets were also not significantly different. Moreover, the nitrogen isotopic values of pupae differed among diets but not pupa types. The mutualistic aspects of myrmechory remain unclear, especially when it comes to estimating the benefits to ants. It is clear that ants assimilate the elaiosome nutrients, but the effect of this assimilation on the reproductive output or sex allocation appears limited. Elaiosomes could provide a nutritional advantage under certain conditions when resources are scarce (qualitative or quantitative), but they are not nutritionally required, and thus represent a food source with no specific advantage to the ant
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12028
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/80432
DOI10.1111/een.12028
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
een12028.pdf1,98 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.