English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/78860
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

European small portable rainfall simulators: A comparison of rainfall characteristics

AuthorsIserloh, T.; Boix-Fayos, Carolina ; Fernández Gálvez, J.; Gómez Calero, José Alfonso ; Gómez Macpherson, H. ; Lázaro, Roberto ; Martínez-Mena García, M. Dolores ; Mingorance, M. Dolores; Regüés-Muñoz, D. ; Solé-Benet, Albert
KeywordsRainfall simulator comparison
Drop size
Drop velocity
Kinetic energy
Spatial rainfall distribution
Water erosion
Issue Date15-Jun-2013
PublisherElsevier
CitationCatena 110 : 100-112 (2013)
Abstract[EN] Small-scale portable rainfall simulators are an essential research tool for investigating the process dynamics of soil erosion and surface hydrology. There is no standardisation of rainfall simulation and such rainfall simulators differ in design, rainfall intensities, rain spectra and research questions, which impede drawing a meaningful comparison between results. Nevertheless, these data become progressively important for soil erosion assessment and therefore, the basis for decision-makers in application-oriented erosion protection. The artificially generated rainfall of the simulators used at the Universities Basel, La Rioja, Malaga, Trier, Tübingen, Valencia, Wageningen, Zaragoza, and at different CSIC (Spanish Scientific Research Council) institutes (Almeria, Cordoba, Granada, Murcia and Zaragoza) was measured with the same methods (Laser Precipitation Monitor for drop spectra and rain collectors for spatial distribution). Data are very beneficial for improvements of simulators and comparison of simulators and results. Furthermore, they can be used for comparative studies, e.g. with measured natural rainfall spectra. A broad range of rainfall data was measured (e.g. intensity: 37–360 mm h− 1; Christiansen Coefficient for spatial rainfall distribution: 61–98%; median volumetric drop diameter: 0.375–6.5 mm; mean kinetic energy expenditure: 25–1322 J m− 2 h− 1; mean kinetic energy per unit area and unit depth of rainfall: 0.77–50 J m− 2 mm− 1). Similarities among the simulators could be found e.g. concerning drop size distributions (maximum drop numbers are reached within the smallest drop classes < 1 mm) and low fall velocities of bigger drops due to a general physical restriction. The comparison represents a good data-base for improvements and provides a consistent picture of the different parameters of the simulators that were tested.
Description28 páginas, 6 figuras, 2 tablas.- The definitive version is available on: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816213001252
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.05.013
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/78860
DOI10.1016/j.catena.2013.05.013
ISSN0341-8162
Appears in Collections:(EEZA) Artículos
(CEBAS) Artículos
(IAS) Artículos
(IACT) Artículos
(IPE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Iserloh et al_Manuscript_Catena2013.pdf1,61 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.