Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/78086
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invite to open peer review
Title

An international round-robin calibration protocol for nanoindentation measurements

AuthorsCabibbo, M.; Ricci, P.; Cecchini, R. CSIC ORCID; Rymuza, Z.; Sullivan, J.; Dub, S.; Cohen, S.
KeywordsNanoindentation
Calibration
Round-robin
Hardness
Young's modulus
Issue DateFeb-2012
PublisherElsevier
CitationMicron 43 (2–3): 215–222 (2012)
AbstractNanoindentation has become a common technique for measuring the hardness and elastic–plastic properties of materials, including coatings and thin films. In recent years, different nanoindenter instruments have been commercialised and used for this purpose. Each instrument is equipped with its own analysis software for the derivation of the hardness and reduced Young's modulus from the raw data. These data are mostly analysed through the Oliver and Pharr method. In all cases, the calibration of compliance and area function is mandatory. The present work illustrates and describes a calibration procedure and an approach to raw data analysis carried out for six different nanoindentation instruments through several round-robin experiments. Three different indenters were used, Berkovich, cube corner, spherical, and three standardised reference samples were chosen, hard fused quartz, soft polycarbonate, and sapphire. It was clearly shown that the use of these common procedures consistently limited the hardness and reduced the Young's modulus data spread compared to the same measurements performed using instrument-specific procedures. The following recommendations for nanoindentation calibration must be followed: (a) use only sharp indenters, (b) set an upper cut-off value for the penetration depth below which measurements must be considered unreliable, (c) perform nanoindentation measurements with limited thermal drift, (d) ensure that the load–displacement curves are as smooth as possible, (e) perform stiffness measurements specific to each instrument/indenter couple, (f) use Fq and Sa as calibration reference samples for stiffness and area function determination, (g) use a function, rather than a single value, for the stiffness and (h) adopt a unique protocol and software for raw data analysis in order to limit the data spread related to the instruments (i.e. the level of drift or noise, defects of a given probe) and to make the H and Er data intercomparable.
Description8 páginas, 5 figuras
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.07.016
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/78086
DOI10.1016/j.micron.2011.07.016
ISSN0968-4328
Appears in Collections:(ICMS) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Micron volume 43, issues 2–3, February 2012, pages 215–222.docx435,92 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

48
checked on Apr 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on Feb 28, 2024

Page view(s)

417
checked on Apr 12, 2024

Download(s)

281
checked on Apr 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.