English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/75457
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Toward an optimal SMOS ocean salinity inversion algorithm

AuthorsGabarró, Carolina ; Portabella, Marcos ; Talone, Marco ; Font, Jordi
KeywordsInversion algorithm
Salinity
SMOS
Issue DateJul-2009
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
CitationIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 6(3): 509-513 (2009)
AbstractAs part of the preparation for the European Space Agency's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite mission, empirical sea-surface emissivity (forward) models have been used to retrieve sea-surface salinity from L-band brightness-temperature (T B) measurements. However, the salinity inversion is not straightforward, and substantial effort is required to define the most appropriate cost function. Various Bayesian-based configurations of the cost function are examined, depending on whether a priori information is used in the inversion. A sensitivity analysis of T B to several geophysical parameters has been performed and has shown that the instrument has low sensitivity to the parameters that modulate the T B (including salinity). The SMOS end-to-end simulator is used to test the accuracy of different cost-function configurations. Currently, the general opinion in the SMOS community is that a partially constrained cost function, in which the salinity constraint is effectively removed, is the most appropriate for salinity retrieval. The purpose of this letter is to show that we found no evidence that such a configuration performs better than a fully constrained or a nonconstrained one. Moreover, in contrast to previous results, we found that the fully constrained inversion does not converge to the reference or auxiliary salinity value and produces the most accurate salinity retrievals of the tested configurations. Therefore, such a configuration should not be disregarded for future tests
Description5 pages, 3 figures, 1 table
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2009.2018490
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/75457
DOI10.1109/LGRS.2009.2018490
Identifiersdoi: 10.1109/LGRS.2009.2018490
issn: 1545-598X
Appears in Collections:(UTM) Artículos
(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.