English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/74192
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Differences in acute stress responses between wild-caught and captive-bred birds: A physiological mechanism contributing to current avian invasions?

AuthorsCabezas, Sonia; Carrete, Martina ; Tella, José Luis ; Marchant, Tracy A.; Bortolotti, Gary R.
Issue Date2013
PublisherKluwer Academic Publishers
CitationBiological Invasions 15: 521- 527 (2013)
AbstractCurrent avian invasions are often the result of exotic birds accidentally escaping from cages. It has been hypothesised that the higher invasiveness of wild-caught cage-birds compared to captive-bred ones could be related to the loss of ability in captive-bred birds to cope with new environments. The acute stress response plays an important role in how animals cope with challenges because elevated corticosterone (CORT) levels can mediate learning and memory consolidation and help to increase their survival prospects. We experimentally tested whether exotic wild-caught and captive-bred cage-birds differ in their responses to acute stress using a representative sample of parrots. Wild-caught individuals showed longer CORT responses to acute stress than captive-bred ones, both at inter- and intra-specific levels when comparing wild-birds to the first generation born in captivity. Captive-bred birds may have attenuated their CORT responses due to acclimation, while high mortality rates during the international trade of wild-caught birds could have selected those individuals that are better able to cope with stress. We suggest that the longer acute response found in wild-caught parrots could help them to escape from cages and survive when facing challenges in new wild environments, possibly contributing to their higher invasiveness. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/74192
DOI10.1007/s10530-012-0304-z
Identifiersdoi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0304-z
issn: 1387-3547
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
biolInv1.pdf199,35 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.