English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/71815
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Título

A Novel Method to Handle the Effect of Uneven Sampling Effort in Biodiversity Databases

AutorPardo Guereño, Iker ; Pata, M. P.; Gómez García, Daniel ; García González, María Begoña
Fecha de publicación2013
EditorPublic Library of Science
CitaciónPLoS ONE 8: (2013)
Resumen[EN] How reliable are results on spatial distribution of biodiversity based on databases? Many studies have evidenced the uncertainty related to this kind of analysis due to sampling effort bias and the need for its quantification. Despite that a number of methods are available for that, little is known about their statistical limitations and discrimination capability, which could seriously constrain their use. We assess for the first time the discrimination capacity of two widely used methods and a proposed new one (FIDEGAM), all based on species accumulation curves, under different scenarios of sampling exhaustiveness using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses. Additionally, we examine to what extent the output of each method represents the sampling completeness in a simulated scenario where the true species richness is known. Finally, we apply FIDEGAM to a real situation and explore the spatial patterns of plant diversity in a National Park. FIDEGAM showed an excellent discrimination capability to distinguish between well and poorly sampled areas regardless of sampling exhaustiveness, whereas the other methods failed. Accordingly, FIDEGAM values were strongly correlated with the true percentage of species detected in a simulated scenario, whereas sampling completeness estimated with other methods showed no relationship due to null discrimination capability. Quantifying sampling effort is necessary to account for the uncertainty in biodiversity analyses, however, not all proposed methods are equally reliable. Our comparative analysis demonstrated that FIDEGAM was the most accurate discriminator method in all scenarios of sampling exhaustiveness, and therefore, it can be efficiently applied to most databases in order to enhance the reliability of biodiversity analyses. © 2013 Pardo et al.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052786
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/71815
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0052786
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052786
issn: 1932-6203
Aparece en las colecciones: (IPE) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Pardo_et_al_journal.pone.2013.pdf397,51 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.