English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/64970
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Native prairie filter strips reduce runoff from hillslopes under annual row-crop systems in Iowa, USA

AuthorsHernández Santana, V. ; Zhou, X.; Herlmers, M. J.; Asbjornsen, H.; Kolka, R.; Tomer, M.
KeywordsAgricultural watersheds
Conservation practices
Corn belt
Hydrologic services restoration
Vegetative buffers
Width- position strips
Issue Date2013
PublisherElsevier
CitationJournal of Hydrology 477: 94-103 (2013)
AbstractIntensively managed annual cropping systems have produced high crop yields but have often produced significant ecosystem services alteration, in particular hydrologic regulation loss. Reconversion of annual agricultural systems to perennial vegetation can lead to hydrologic function restoration, but its effect is still not well understood. Therefore, our objective was to assess the effects of strategic introduction of different amounts and location of native prairie vegetation (NPV) within agricultural landscapes on hydrological regulation. The study was conducted in Iowa (USA), and consisted of a fully balanced, replicated, incomplete block design whereby 12 zero-order ephemeral flow watersheds received four treatments consisting of varying proportions (0%, 10%, and 20%) of prairie vegetation located in different watershed positions (footslope vs. contour strips). Runoff volume and rate were measured from 2008 to 2010 (April–October) with an H-Flume installed in each catchment, and automated ISCO samplers. Over the entire study period, we observed a total of 129 runoff events with an average runoff volume reduction of 37% based on the three treatments with NPV compared to watersheds with row crops. We observed a progressively greater reduction across the 3 years of the study as the perennial strips became established with the greatest differences among treatments occurring in 2010. The differences among the watersheds were attributed mainly to NPV amount and position, with the 10% NPV at footslope treatment having the greatest runoff reduction probably because the portion of NPV filter strip that actually contacted watershed runoff was greater with the 10% NPV at footslope. We observed greater reductions in runoff in spring and fall likely because perennial prairie plants were active and crops were absent or not fully established. High antecedent soil moisture sometimes led to little benefit of the NPV treatments but in general the NPV treatments were effective during both small and large events. We conclude that, small amounts of NPV strategically incorporated into corn-soybean watersheds in the Midwest US can be used to effectively reduce runoff.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/64970
DOI10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.013
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.013
issn: 0022-1694
Appears in Collections:(IRNAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Native prairie filter strips reduce runoff.pdf1,06 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.