English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/64619
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Spatial distribution and mapping of crenate broomrape infestations in continuous broad bean cropping

AuthorsGonzález-Andújar, José Luis ; Martínez-Cob, Antonio ; López Granados, Francisca ; García Torres, Luis
Keywordsgeostatistics
kriging
parasitic weed
patch
precision farming
Issue DateNov-2001
PublisherWeed Science Society of America
CitationWeed Science 49 (6): 773-779 (2001)
AbstractGeostatistical techniques were used to describe and map the spatial distribution of crenate broomrape populations parasitizing broad bean over 6 yr (from 1985 to 1990). In the first year, the spatial distribution was random, but from 1986 to 1989, crenate broomrape populations were clearly aggregated. The crenate broomrape infection severity (IS: number of emerged broomrape m−2) increased every year, from an average of 0.45 in 1985 to 29.4 in 1989, with a slight decrease the following year (IS = 27.4). Spherical functions provided the best fit because the cross-validation criteria were accomplished in all study cases. Kriged estimates were used to draw contour maps of the populations. About 34.3, 43.3, and 74.3% of the field plot surface exhibited an IS ≥ 1 (economic threshold) in 1985, 1986, and 1987, respectively, and nearly 100% of the area exceeded the economic threshold from 1988 to 1990; 1985 and 1986 were key years for control of the parasitic weed population. The percentage of infested area at different IS intervals in each year's map obtained by kriging was used to estimate the percentage of yield losses in each infested area (YA) with the equation: YA = A * Ymax * (1 − IS * 0.124), where A is the infested area at a given IS interval and Ymax is the expected broomrape-free broad bean yield. Yield losses under different IS intervals were compared with yield loss attributable to a uniform distribution of crenate broomrape. Results showed that yield loss assuming a uniform distribution of crenate broomrape was clearly overestimated, which is important to avoid overuse of herbicides.
Description7 Pags., 4 Tabls., 6 Figs.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0773:SDAMOC]2.0.CO;2
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/64619
DOI10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049
ISSN0043-1745
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GonzalezAndujarJL_WeedSci_2001.pdf5,4 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.