English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/61876
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Spatial performance of four climate field reconstruction methods targeting the Common Era

AuthorsSmerdon, Jason E.; Kaplan, A.; Zorita, Eduardo; González-Rouco, J. F. ; Evans, M. N.
KeywordsCommon Era
climate field reconstructions
general circulation model
late Holocene
pseudoproxy
statistical climatology
Climate variability
Paleoclimatology
Issue Date15-Jun-2011
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union
CitationSmerdon, J.E., Kaplan, A., Zorita, E., González-Rouco, J.F., Evans, M.N. (2011). Spatial performance of four climate field reconstruction methods targeting the Common Era. Geophysical Research Letters, 38. L11705-1-L11705-6. doi: 10.1029/2011GL047372
AbstractThe spatial skill of four climate field reconstruction (CFR) methods is investigated using pseudoproxy experiments (PPEs) based on two millennial-length general circulation model simulations. Results indicate that presently available global and hemispheric CFRs for the Common Era likely suffer from spatial uncertainties not previously characterized. No individual method produced CFRs with universally superior spatial error statistics, making it difficult to advocate for one method over another. Northern Hemisphere means are shown to be insufficient for evaluating spatial skill, indicating that the spatial performance of future CFRs should be rigorously tested for dependence on proxy type and location, target data and employed methodologies. Observed model-dependent methodological performance also indicates that CFR methods must be tested across multiple models and conclusions from PPEs should be carefully evaluated against the spatial statistics of real-world climatic fields.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047372
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/61876
DOI10.1029/2011GL047372
ISSN0094-8276
Appears in Collections:(IGEO) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GRL_2011_38_L11705.pdf2,4 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.