English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/61685
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColomer, Josep M.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-03T09:36:22Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-03T09:36:22Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationPS: Political Science and Politics 37(4): 793-794 (2004)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1049-0965-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/61685-
dc.description2 páginas.-- A Commentary on Giovanni Sartori.es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn his reflections on “Where is Political Science Going?,” professor Sartori brightly points out some present flaws in the discipline: too much empiricism and too little applied research. At attacking “American-type” political science, however, I think he chooses a mistaken enemy. I will hold, in contrast, that the main source of the mentioned flaws is the weakness of political theory.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCambridge University Presses_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.titlePolitical Science is Going Ahead (By Convoluted Ways)es_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1049096504045160-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504045160es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1537-5935-
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Political Science is Going Ahead.pdf29,92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.