English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/59879
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Performance of Drought Indices for Ecological, Agricultural, and Hydrological Applications

AuthorsVicente Serrano, Sergio M. CSIC ORCID ; Beguería, Santiago CSIC ORCID ; Lorenzo-Lacruz, Jorge CSIC ORCID; Camarero, Jesús Julio CSIC ORCID ; López-Moreno, Juan I. CSIC ORCID ; Azorín-Molina, César CSIC ORCID; Revuelto, Jesús CSIC ORCID; Morán-Tejeda, Enrique CSIC ORCID CVN; Sánchez-Lorenzo, Arturo CSIC ORCID
Keywordsdrought index
drought vulnerability
Agricultural droughts
hydrological droughts
Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)
Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI)
Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)
Issue DateSep-2012
PublisherAmerican Meteorological Society
CitationVicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S, Lorenzo-Lacruz J, Camarero JJ, López-Moreno JI, Azorin-Molina C, Revuelto J, Morán-Tejeda E, Sanchez-Lorenzo. Performance of Drought Indices for Ecological, Agricultural, and Hydrological Applications. Earth Interactions 16: 1-27 (2012)
AbstractIn this study, the authors provide a global assessment of the performance of different drought indices for monitoring drought impacts on several hydrological, agricultural, and ecological response variables. For this purpose, they compare the performance of several drought indices [the standardized precipitation index (SPI); four versions of the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI); and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI)] to predict changes in streamflow, soil moisture, forest growth, and crop yield. The authors found a superior capability of the SPEI and the SPI drought indices, which are calculated on different time scales than the Palmer indices to capture the drought impacts on the aforementioned hydrological, agricultural, and ecological variables. They detected small differences in the comparative performance of the SPI and the SPEI indices, but the SPEI was the drought index that best captured the responses of the assessed variables to drought in summer, the season in which more drought-related impacts are recorded and in which drought monitoring is critical. Hence, the SPEI shows improved capability to identify drought impacts as compared with the SPI. In conclusion, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of the SPEI if the responses of the variables of interest to drought are not known a priori.
Description40 Pags., 11 Figs., 3 Tabls. The definitive version is available at: http://journals.ametsoc.org/loi/eint
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2012EI000434.1
Appears in Collections:(IPE) Artículos
(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BegueriaS_EarthInterac_2012.pdf1,25 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.