English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/59101
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Marine protection and meadow size alter fish herbivory in seagrass ecosystems.

AuthorsPrado, Patricia ; Farina, S. ; Tomàs, Fiona ; Romero, Javier; Alcoverro, Teresa
KeywordsSarpa salpa
Paracentrotus lividus
Seagrass herbivory
Fishing protection
Meadow size
Posidonia oceanica
Issue Date19-Nov-2008
PublisherInter Research
CitationMarine Ecology Progress Series 371 : 11-21 (2008)
AbstractIn this study, we examine the hypotheses that the size of the seagrass meadow and marine protection influence the abundance of seagrass herbivores and their associated grazing pressure. The effect of meadow size was tested in 9 shallow unprotected meadows of Posidonia oceanica encompassing a wide range of areas. The effect of fishing protection was examined by comparing 9 unprotected meadows (controls) with 3 marine protected areas (MPAs) with at least 20 yr of protection that also varied in meadow size (large >3 ha, medium 1 ha < x < 2 ha and small <1 ha). At each site, we quantified the abundance, size distribution and grazing pressure of the 2 most important herbivores, the fish Sarpa salpa and the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. A strong negative relationship between meadow size and both the abundance and grazing rates of S. salpa was evident in the unprotected meadows, but no effects were detected on either the abundance or grazing rates of P. lividus. Results also showed that populations of S. salpa (mainly large individuals) benefit from fishing protection and tended to concentrate in MPAs (with the exception of Port-Cros), resulting in enhanced grazing pressure. In P. lividus abundances or size distributions did not present any significant difference between protected and unprotected areas, although most MPAs presented low sea urchin densities. While MPAs are important to preserve seagrass ecosystems, results from this study indicate that it is crucial to account for the size of these habitats, particularly when functional aspects of seagrass habitats are so strongly altered by size.
Description11 páginas, 4 tablas, 6 figuras.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps07662
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/59101
DOI10.3354/meps07662
ISSN0171-8630
E-ISSN1616-1599
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prado et al MPA seagrassherbiv08.pdf293,96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.