English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/58638
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Comparative study of two analytical procedures for the determination of acid insoluble ash for evaluation of nutrient retention in broilers | Estudio comparativo de dos metodologías analíticas utilizadas para la determinación de cenizas insolubles en ácido para evaluar la retención de nutrientes en pollos de engorde

AuthorsCoca-Sinova, A. de; Mateos, G. G.; González-Alvarado, J. M.; Centeno, Carmen ; Lázaro, Rosa; Jiménez-Moreno, E.
KeywordsAnalytical methodologies
Inert markers
Metabolisable energy
Nutrient digestibility
Poultry
Issue Date2011
PublisherMinisterio de Ciencia y Tecnología (España)
CitationSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 761- 768 (2011)
AbstractInert markers are routinely used in research to estimate nutrient retention and apparent metabolisable energy nitrogen-corrected (AMEn) content of poultry diets. Acid insoluble ash (AIA) is used as a marker to substitute metal compounds because of environmental concerns. In the current research, two methodologies recommended for determining AIA content in feeds and excretas for the evaluation of total tract apparent retention (TTAR) of nutrients, were compared in 12 broiler diets. The experimental design was completely randomised with 2 AIA analytical techniques and 12 dietary treatments that resulted from a combination of two cereals (corn and rice), two heat processing of the cereal (raw and cooked) and three fiber sources (control with no added fibre, 3% oat hulls and 3% soybean hulls). All diets included 1% celite (diatomaceous earth) as additional source of AIA. The techniques used for AIA determination were coded as VO and GA, respectively. The TTAR of dry matter and organic matter and the AMEn of the feeds differed (p ≤ 0.001) among diets and were lower when using GA than when using VO (p ≤ 0.05). However, no interaction between diet and methodology was observed. Moreover, the TTAR of nutrients as determined by both techniques, were highly correlated (r > 0.98). We concluded that the GA methodology results in lower retention values than the VO methodology but that both methodologies can be used indistinctly to estimate TTAR of nutrients in broiler feeds.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/58638
DOI10.5424/sjar/20110903-439-10
ISSN1695-971X
E-ISSN2171-9292
Appears in Collections:(ICTAN) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ComparativeStudy.pdf66,07 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.