English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/57871
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Female-biased mortality in experimentally parasitized Alpine Swift Apus melba nestlings

AuthorsBize, P.; Roulin, A.; Tella, José Luis ; Richner, Heinz
Issue Date2005
PublisherBlackwell Publishing
CitationFunctional Ecology 19: 405- 413 (2005)
Abstract1. Sex-biased mortality in adult vertebrates is often attributed to lower immunocompetence and higher parasite susceptibility of males. Although sex-specific mortality has also been reported during growth, the importance of sex-specific immunocompetence and parasite susceptibility in explaining male-biased mortality remains ambiguous in growing individuals because of potentially confounding sources of mortality such as sexual dimorphism. 2. Here, we investigated sex-specific susceptibility to the blood-sucking louse fly Crataerina melbae and sex differences in cell-mediated immunity in a bird species that is sexually monomorphic both in size and plumage coloration at the nestling stage, the Alpine Swift, Apus melba. 3. For this purpose, we manipulated ectoparasite loads by adding or removing flies to randomly chosen nests in two years, and injected nestlings with mitogenic phytohae-magglutinin (PHA) in another year. 4. There were no significant differences between male and female offspring in immune response towards PHA, parasite load, and parasite-induced decrease in growth rate. Secondary sex ratios were however biased toward males in parasitized broods, and this was explained by a greater mortality of females in parasitized than deparasitized broods. 5. Our findings are in contrast to the widely accepted hypothesis that males suffer a greater cost of parasitism. We discuss alternative hypotheses accounting for female-specific mortality. © 2005 British Ecological Society.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/57871
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00995.x
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00995.x
issn: 0269-8463
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
funct.pdf240,91 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.