Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/56583
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlasaad, Samer-
dc.contributor.authorSoglia, D.-
dc.contributor.authorMaione, Sabatino-
dc.contributor.authorSartore, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSoriguer, Ramón C.-
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Jesús M.-
dc.contributor.authorRasero, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Luca-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-24T09:51:23Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-24T09:51:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9196-0-
dc.identifierissn: 0168-8162-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental and Applied Acarology 47: 173- 178 (2009)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/56583-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to assess whether individual Sarcoptes mites collected from frozen skin ('postponed isolation' method) are suitable sources of PCR-quality genomic DNA, and to test the effectiveness of this method in comparison with the 'direct isolation' method, often used through force of habit. Hundreds of single Sarcoptes scabiei samples, resulting from direct (live) or postponed (post-frozen) isolation, were tested using a ∼450 bp product (ITS-2) and multi-locus 10x genotyping with microsatellite markers. No statistical difference in yield of soluble DNA was found between the two isolation methods. Nevertheless, 19% of the reactions were classified as failed preparations in the direct isolation method, whereas the rate of unsuccessful reactions was 34% in the postponed isolation method. Consequently, post-frozen isolation is suitable and recommendable for Sarcoptes mite gDNA preparation, particularly when performing a balancing act among safety, practicability and profitability. These results have implications for mite collection for DNA extraction, and hence the needed wider leap of Sarcoptes into the genetic era. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.titleEffectiveness of the postponed isolation (post-frozen isolation) method for PCR-quality Sarcoptes mite gDNA-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10493-008-9196-0-
dc.date.updated2012-09-24T09:51:24Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

348
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

93
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.