Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/56509Share/Export:
 SHARE
 CORE
BASE
|
|
| Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
| Title: | Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy |
Authors: | Klionsky, Daniel J.; Boya, Patricia CSIC ORCID ; Calvo-Garrido, Javier CSIC; Escalante, Ricardo CSIC ORCID ; Díaz-Nido, Javier CSIC ORCID; Izquierdo, Marta CSIC; Crespo, José L. CSIC ORCID ; González García, Ramón CSIC ORCID ; Hilfiker, Sabine; Navarro, Miguel; Pozuelo-Rubio, Mercedes CSIC; Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago ; Sánchez-Alcázar, José Antonio CSIC ORCID ; Lazo, Pedro A. CSIC ORCID ; Mollinedo, Faustino CSIC ORCID ; Oliver, Francisco Javier; González-Rey, Elena CSIC ORCID; Campos-Salinas, Jenny | Issue Date: | 1-Apr-2012 | Publisher: | Landes Bioscience | Citation: | Autophagy 8(4): 445-544 (2012) | Abstract: | In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field. © 2012 Landes Bioscience. | Description: | Klionsky, Daniel J. et al. | Publisher version (URL): | http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.19496 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/56509 | DOI: | 10.4161/auto.19496 | E-ISSN: | 1554-8635 | Identifiers: | doi: 10.4161/auto.19496 issn: 1554-8627 |
| Appears in Collections: | (CABIMER) Artículos (IBMCC) Artículos (IBVF) Artículos (CBM) Artículos (CIB) Artículos (IIBM) Artículos (ICVV) Artículos (IPBLN) Artículos (CABD) Artículos |
Show full item record
Review this work
PubMed Central
Citations
1,691
checked on Jan 26, 2023
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2,768
checked on Jan 26, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3,002
checked on Jan 22, 2023
Page view(s)
655
checked on Jan 27, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Related articles:
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.