English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/55119
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFilella, Iolanda-
dc.contributor.authorBosch, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorLlusia, Joan-
dc.contributor.authorPeñuelas, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorPeñuelas, Josep-
dc.identifier.citationBiochemical Systematics and Ecology 39: 498-508 (2011)es_ES
dc.description11 páginas, 6 figuras , 1 tabla.es_ES
dc.description.abstractHost recognition is a key process in oligolectic bees but the mechanisms through which they find and recognize appropriate pollen host plant are not entirely clear. Hoplitis adunca is a monolectic bee collecting pollen only from Echium spp. (Boraginaceae). We aimed to test whether Echium vulgare floral scent plays a major role in the attraction of H. adunca females, and to identify components of E. vulgare scent that may be involved in this specific attraction. We used a combination of behavioral and chemical (GC/GC–MS, PTR-MS) analyses. In order to identify the chemical cues likely to be involved in the specific attraction of H. adunca, we compared the scent of fresh flowers, nectar, pollen, and whole plants of E. vulgare and Anchusa officinalis, another Boraginaceae, which does not attract H. adunca. H. adunca females were attracted to the scent of E. vulgare flowers when offered against a blank or against the scent of A. officinalis flowers. However, H. adunca females were not attracted to the scent of A. officinalis flowers when offered against a blank. The emission spectra of the two plant species differed markedly, as did the emission spectra of various flower components (pollen, nectar and whole flowers) within a species. Pollen presented a low volatile release, but emitted significantly higher amounts of mass 55 (butanal, 1,3-butadiene, or other volatiles of molecular mass 54), and mass 83 (hexanal, hexenols, hexenyl acetate, or other volatiles of molecular mass 82) in E. vulgare than in A. officinalis. Nectar produced a particular emission spectrum with high emission rates of masses 109 and 123. Mass 109 may likely correspond to 1,4-benzoquinone, a volatile specifically measured in E. vulgare in parallel studies to this one. The flower emission spectrum was mainly a combination of the pollen and the nectar scents, although it also contained additional volatile compounds such as those of mass 63 or mass 81. As for terpenes, E. vulgare emitted limonene, longicyclene, junipene, trans-caryophyllene and a-humulene, that were not detected in A. officinalis, and the most emitted monoterpenes were a-pinene, junipene and limonene whereas the most emitted terpenoid by A. officinalis was a-pinene. After identifying these chemical cues, olfactory/behavioural assays with specific volatiles and combinations of volatiles are necessary to understand the chemical interactions of the H. adunca-E. vulgare system.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Spanish MEC grants CGL-2006-04025/BOS, CGL2010-17172, and Consolider-Ingenio Montes CSD2008-00040, the European Science Foundation “VOCBAS” program, and a Catalan government SGR2009-458 grant.es_ES
dc.subjectHoplitis aduncaes_ES
dc.subjectEchium vulgarees_ES
dc.subjectVolatile organic compoundses_ES
dc.titleChemical cues involved in the attraction of the oligolectic bee Hoplitis adunca to its host plant Echium vulgarees_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.