Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/51835
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invite to open peer review
Title

Biomic Specialization and Speciation Rates in Ruminants (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia): A Test of the Resource-Use Hypothesis at the Global Scale

AuthorsCantalapiedra, Juan L. CSIC ORCID ; Hernández Fernández, M. CSIC ORCID; Morales, Jorge CSIC ORCID CVN
KeywordsMacroevolución
Mammalia
Paleobiología
Artiodactyla
Neógeno
Cuaternario
Cambio climático
Especiación
Especialización ecológica
Issue DateDec-2011
CitationPLoS ONE 6(12): e28749
AbstractThe resource-use hypothesis proposed by E.S. Vrba predicts that specialist species have higher speciation and extinction rates than generalists because they are more susceptible to environmental changes and vicariance. In this work, we test some of the predictions derived from this hypothesis on the 197 extant and recently extinct species of Ruminantia (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia) using the biomic specialization index (BSI) of each species, which is based on its distribution within different biomes. We ran 10000 Monte Carlo simulations of our data in order to get a null distribution of BSI values against which to contrast the observed data. Additionally, we drew on a supertree of the ruminants and a phylogenetic likelihood-based method (QuaSSE) for testing whether the degree of biomic specialization affects speciation rates in ruminant lineages. Our results are consistent with the predictions of the resource-use hypothesis, which foretells a higher speciation rate of lineages restricted to a single biome (BSI = 1) and higher frequency of specialist species in biomes that underwent high degree of contraction and fragmentation during climatic cycles. Bovids and deer present differential specialization across biomes; cervids show higher specialization in biomes with a marked hydric seasonality (tropical deciduous woodlands and schlerophyllous woodlands), while bovids present higher specialization in a greater variety of biomes. This might be the result of divergent physiological constraints as well as a different biogeographic and evolutionary history.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028749
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/51835
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0028749
Appears in Collections:(IGEO) Artículos
(MNCN) Artículos




Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Cantalapiedra et al (2011).pdf365,27 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

10
checked on Apr 25, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
checked on Feb 27, 2024

Page view(s)

365
checked on May 21, 2024

Download(s)

276
checked on May 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.