Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/50930
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRiesgo Gil, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Porro, Alicia R.-
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Susana-
dc.contributor.authorLeys, S. P.-
dc.contributor.authorGiribet, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-06T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-06T08:46:39Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Ecology Resources : (2011)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1755-098X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/50930-
dc.description11 páginas, 4 figuras, 2 tablas.es_ES
dc.description.abstractTranscriptome sequencing with next-generation sequencing technologies has the potential for addressing many longstanding questions about the biology of sponges. Transcriptome sequence quality depends on good cDNA libraries, which requires high-quality mRNA. Standard protocols for preserving and isolating mRNA often require optimization for unusual tissue types. Our aim was assessing the efficiency of two preservation modes, (i) flash freezing with liquid nitrogen (LN2) and (ii) immersion in RNAlater, for the recovery of high-quality mRNA from sponge tissues.We also tested whether the long-term storage of samples at )80 C affects the quantity and quality of mRNA. We extracted mRNA from nine sponge species and analysed the quantity and quality (A260 ⁄ 230 and A260⁄ 280 ratios) of mRNA according to preservation method, storage time, and taxonomy. The quantity and quality of mRNA depended significantly on the preservation method used (LN2 outperforming RNAlater), the sponge species, and the interaction between them.When the preservation was analysed in combination with either storage time or species, the quantity and A260 ⁄ 230 ratio were both significantly higher for LN2-preserved samples. Interestingly, individual comparisons for each preservation method over time indicated that both methods performed equally efficiently during the first month, but RNAlater lost efficiency in storage times longer than 2 months compared with flash-frozen samples. In summary, we find that for long-term preservation of samples, flash freezing is the preferred method. If LN2 is not available, RNAlater can be used, but mRNA extraction during the first month of storage is advisedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship to A.R., a FPI pre-doctoral Fellowship (BES-2008-003009) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and a grant included in the project Benthomics (CTM2010-22218-C02-01) to A.R.R.-P., and a Fulbright of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (EX2009-0128) to S.C. This material is based upon work supported by a grant of the Marie Curie Outgoing Fellowship Program to A.R., by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DEB #0844881 to G.G, and NSERC Discovery and Ship Time grants to S.P.L.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishinges_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectRNA isolationes_ES
dc.subjectRNAlateres_ES
dc.subjectFlash freezinges_ES
dc.subjectIlluminaes_ES
dc.subjectMessenger RNAes_ES
dc.subjectNucleic acidses_ES
dc.titleOptimization of preservation and storage time of sponge tissues to obtain quality mRNA for next-generation sequencing.es_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03097.x-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03097.xes_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEAB) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

335
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.