Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/4953
Share/Export:
![]() ![]() |
|
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Title: | Efficiency of fly ash belite cement and zeolite matrices for immobilizing cesium |
Authors: | Goñi Elizalde, Sara ; Guerrero Bustos, Ana María ; Lorenzo García, M.ª Paz | Keywords: | Fly ash belite cement Diffusion Cesium Gismondine-type Na-P1 zeolite |
Issue Date: | 2006 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Citation: | Journal of Hazardous Materials B137 (2006) 1608–1617 | Abstract: | The efficiency of innovative matrices for immobilizing cesium is presented in this work. The matrix formulation included the use of fly ash belite cement (FABC-2-W) and gismondine-type Na-P1 zeolite, both of which are synthesized from fly ash of coal combustion. The efficiency for immobilizing cesium is evaluated from the leaching test ANSI/ANS 16.1-1986 at the temperature of 40ºC, from which the apparent diffusion coefficient of cesium is obtained. Matrices with 100% of FABC-2-W are used as a reference. The integrity of matrices is evaluated by porosity and pore-size distribution from mercury intrusion porosimetry, X-ray diffraction and nitrogen adsorption analyses. Both matrices can be classified as good solidify systems for cesium, specially the FABC-2-W/zeolite matrix in which the replacement of 50% of belite cement by the gismondinetype Na-P1 zeolite caused a decrease of two orders of magnitude of cesium mean Effective Diffusion Coefficient (De) (2.8e−09 cm2/s versus 2.2e−07 cm2/s, for FABC-2-W/zeolite and FABC-2-W matrices, respectively). | Description: | 10 pages.-- Final full-text version of the paper available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.059. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/4953 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.059 | ISSN: | 0304-3894 |
Appears in Collections: | (IETCC) Artículos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
HAZMAT-CS-uv.pdf | 1,77 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Review this work
SCOPUSTM
Citations
57
checked on May 12, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
53
checked on May 12, 2022
Page view(s)
351
checked on May 17, 2022
Download(s)
262
checked on May 17, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Dimensions
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.