English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/46790
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Grazing rates of protists in wetlands under contrasting light conditions due to floating plants

AuthorsIzaguirre, Irina; Sinistro, Rodrigo; Schiaffino, M. Romina; Sánchez, María Laura; Unrein, Fernando ; Massana, Ramon
KeywordsPhagotrophy
Protists
Mixotrophic algae
Grazing rates
Wetland
Light ­attenuation
Issue DateFeb-2012
PublisherInter Research
CitationAquatic Microbial Ecology 65(3): 221-232 (2012)
AbstractWe examined the effect of light attenuation, due to floating plants, on the community structure of the main phagotrophic protists and their grazing rates in a wetland in the Lower Paraná Basin. Ingestion experiments (winter and summer) were conducted at 2 sites in the same shallow lake that had contrasting light scenarios: open waters (light) and under profuse macrophyte coverage (dark: light attenuation ~97%). We compared the rates at which protists ingested 3 types of tracer prey: fluorescently labelled heterotrophic bacteria (FLB), picocyanobacteria (FLC) and picoeukaryotic algae (FLA). Light influenced both the structure of the microbial communities and the protistan grazing rates. Heterotrophic flagellates (HF) were more abundant under the macrophytes, whereas mixotrophic algae (cryptophytes) and autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton populations attained higher abundances in open waters. Specific grazing rates (SGRs) of mixotrophs on heterotrophic bacteria (HB) were higher in the light (7.9 to 15.5 prey cells grazer−1 h−1), than in darkness (0.1 to 5.1 prey cells grazer−1 h−1); the same trend was observed on picocyanobacteria (Pcy) (1.1 and 0.2 prey cells grazer−1 h−1, light and dark). SGRs of HF were 1.0 to 7.3 cells grazer−1 h−1 (on HB) and 0.01 to 1.8 prey cells grazer−1 h−1 (on Pcy), with highest values in summer and no pattern in relation to light. SGRs of ciliates were higher in summer and in darkness. Clearance rates (CR) on Pcy were higher than on HB, for both HF and mixotrophic algae. In winter, cryptophytes contributed up to 93% of the microbial grazing in the light, whereas HF were more important in darkness; in summer, bacterivory was dominated by heterotrophs in both light scenarios. Our experimental results highlight the importance of light conditions in structuring bacterial grazing by protists
Description12 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01547
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/46790
DOI10.3354/ame01547
ISSN0948-3055
E-ISSN1616-1564
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Izaguirre_et_al_2012.pdf506,03 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.