English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/45713
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Indolent systemic mastocytosis without skin involvement vs. isolated bone marrow mastocytosis

AuthorsEscribano, Luis; Álvarez-Twose, Iván; García-Montero, Andrés ; Sánchez-Muñoz, Laura; Jara-Acevedo, Maria; Orfao, Alberto
KeywordsBone marrow mastocytosis
Issue Date1-Apr-2011
PublisherFerrata Storti Foundation
CitationHaematologica 96(4): e26 (2011)
AbstractWe have read with great interest the paper by Zanotti et al.1 about the description of “Isolated bone marrow mastocytosis” (BMM) as an underestimated subvariant of indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM). This is a very interesting paper in which an in depth study was performed in a total of 99 consecutive ISM patients, diagnosed either prospectively or retrospectively according to the 2008 WHO classification.2 However, the term used to define the series of BMM might not be the most appropriate and may lead to confusion in the field. In Zanotti’s report, after an in depth study, 46 of 84 patients (54.7%) who were referred because of unexplained/recurrent anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions to hymenoptera sting in the absence of typical skin lesions (e.g. mastocytosis in the skin; MIS), were classified as BMM. It is noteworthy that, indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) in the absence of skin involvement (ISMs−) has been previously recognized and described by several groups. In fact, it was first recognized as a clinical entity in 19913 and later, its clinical, biological, morphological, immunophenotypical and KIT mutational characteristics have been established in a large series of cases.4 In addition, Dr. Zanotti co-authored an elegant paper on hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis and mastocytosis in which patients lacking MIS but fulfilling criteria for SM are classified as ISMs−.5 Detailed analysis of the reported isolated BM mastocytosis cases1 shows that most likely they correspond to the previously identified ISMs-patients. It should be emphasized that ISMs− clearly differs from isolated BM mastocytosis in that the latter is an exceptional subcategory of ISM in the absence of both skin lesions and MC-mediator related symptoms. In addition, subjects with isolated BM mastocytosis typically show a low MC burden2;6 and their diagnosis is occasionally made during a BM study for pathological conditions other than mastocytosis, due to its clinically silent behavior (only 5 cases in our data base, Spanish Network on Mastocytosis-REMA−, data not shown). Conversely, ISMs− is a “true” systemic disease based on the observation of systemic mast cell-mediator related symptoms, difficult to explain in a BM restricted MC condition. ISMs− is also frequently associated with osteoporosis and presence of multilineal KIT mutations is detected in 3 out of 47 cases (6.7%) in our published series4 and in a total of 4 out of 62 (6.4%) cases in the updated REMA’s data base (REMA, unpublished data, 2011) which confers to these patients an increased probability for disease progression. The term isolated BM mastocytosis may lead the readership not familiar with this disease to consider this condition to be benign and of a localized nature, when in fact it may be associated with life-threatening or even fatal anaphylaxis with possibly around 5% of cases progressing to aggressive disease.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.040865
Appears in Collections:(IBMCC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.3324-haematol.2011.040865.pdf187,07 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.