Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/44390
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMurado García, Miguel Anxo-
dc.contributor.authorVázquez, José Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorRial, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorBeiras, Ricardo-
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-17T16:16:49Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-17T16:16:49Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-30-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hazardous Materials 185(2-3): 807-817 (2011)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/44390-
dc.description.abstractSingle and joint effects of hydrocarbons and a shoreline cleaning agent (SCA) were studied by measuring the inhibition of the larval growth of sea urchin. Different dosage methods of hydrophobic compounds were compared. The results obtained in the evaluation of CytoSol toxicity revealed that the method of variable dilution of water accommodated fraction (WAF) led to the more conservative toxicological approach. Regarding to Libyan oil, the use of DMSO as carrier allowed us the evaluation of its potential toxicity in comparison with the limitations imposed to the use of WAF method. A reparametrised form of the Weibull equation was slightly modified to be useful for dose–response analysis. This was the basis for modelling single sigmoid responses, which were used to simulate biphasic profiles with addition of effects and to describe both the concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) hypotheses. In all cases, its descriptive ability was graphically and statistically satisfactory. The IA model was the best option to explain the combined experimental responses obtained.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful to the Centro para la Prevención y Lucha contra la Contaminación Marítima y del Litoral (CEPRECO, Ministerio de la Presidencia) for the financial support of this study.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectPrestige oil spilles_ES
dc.subjectShoreline cleaning agentses_ES
dc.subjectDose–response modelses_ES
dc.subjectHormesises_ES
dc.subjectIndependent actiones_ES
dc.subjectConcentration additiones_ES
dc.titleDose–response modelling with two agents: Application to the bioassay of oil and shoreline cleaning agentses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.092-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.092es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn0304-3894-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IIM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Dose-response.pdf431,14 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on 21-feb-2024

Page view(s)

278
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

278
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.