Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/4405
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Simulation of Maize Grain Yield Variability within a Surface-Irrigated Field

AutorCavero Campo, José CSIC ORCID ; Playán Jubillar, Enrique CSIC ORCID ; Playán Jubillar, Enrique CSIC ORCID ; Zapata Ruiz, Nery CSIC ORCID ; Zapata Ruiz, Nery CSIC ORCID ; Faci González, José María
Fecha de publicaciónjul-2001
EditorAmerican Society of Agronomy
CitaciónAgronomy Journal 93(4): 773-782 (2001)
ResumenSpatial variability of crop yield within a surface-irrigated field is related to spatial variability of available water due to nonuniform irrigation and soil characteristics, among other factors (e.g., soil fertility). The infiltrated depth at each location within the field can be estimated by measurements of opportunity time and infiltration rate or simulated with irrigation models. We investigated the use of the crop growth model EPICphase to simulate the spatial variability of maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield within a level basin using estimated or simulated (with the irrigation model B2D) infiltrated depth. The relevance of the spatial variability of infiltration rate, opportunity time, and soil surface elevation in the simulation of grain yield spatial variability was also investigated. The measured maize grain yields at 73 locations within the level basin, ranging from 3.16 to 11.54 t ha-1 (SD = 1.79 t ha-1), were used for comparison. Estimated infiltrated depth considering uniform infiltration rate resulted in poor simulation of the spatial variability of grain yield [SD = 0.59 t ha-1, root mean square error (RMSE) = 1.98 t ha-1]. Simulated infiltrated depth with the irrigation model considering uniform infiltration rate and soil surface elevation resulted in grain yield simulations with lower variability than measured (SD = 0.64 t ha-1, RMSE = 1.58 t ha-1). Introducing both sources of spatial variability in the irrigation model resulted in the best simulation of grain yield spatial variability (SD = 1.68 t ha-1, RMSE = 1.16 t ha-1; regression of calculated vs. measured yields: slope = 0.74, r2 = 0.56).
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.934773x
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/4405
DOI10.2134/agronj2001.934773x
ISSN0002-1962
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos

Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on 13-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

352
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.