English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/40301
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

A linkage survey of 20 dominant retinitis pigmentosa families: frequencies of the nine known loci and evidence for further heterogeneity

AuthorsInglehearn, Christopher F.; Bhattacharya, Shom Shanker
KeywordsADRP
Retina
Retinitis pigmentosa
Retinal degeneration
Issue DateJan-1998
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
CitationJournal of Medical Genetics 35(1): 1-5 (1998)
AbstractAutosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP) is caused by mutations in two known genes, rhodopsin and peripherin/Rds, and seven loci identified only by linkage analysis. Rhodopsin and peripherin/Rds have been estimated to account for 20-31% and less than 5% of ADRP, respectively. No estimate of frequency has previously been possible for the remaining loci, since these can only be implicated when families are large enough for linkage analysis. We have carried out such analyses on 20 unrelated pedigrees with 11 or more meioses. Frequency estimates based on such a small sample provide only broad approximations, while the above estimations are based on mutation detection in much larger clinic based patient series. However, when markers are informative, linkage analysis cannot fail to detect disease causation at a locus, whereas mutation detection techniques might miss some mutations. Also diagnosing dominant RP from a family history taken in a genetic clinic may not be reliable. It is therefore interesting that 10 (50%) of the families tested have rhodopsin-RP, suggesting that, in large clearly dominant RP pedigrees, rhodopsin may account for a higher proportion of disease than had previously been suspected. Four (20%) map to chromosome 19q, implying that this is the second most common ADRP locus. One maps to chromosome 7p, one to 17p, and one to 17q, while none maps to 1cen, peripherin/Rds, 8q, or 7q. Three give exclusion of all of these loci, showing that while the majority of dominant RP maps to the known loci, a small proportion derives from loci yet to be identified.
Description5 páginas, 1 figura, 3 tablas.-- et al.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.35.1.1
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/40301
DOI10.1136/jmg.35.1.1
ISSN0022-2593
E-ISSN1468-6244
Appears in Collections:(CABIMER) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.