English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/39183
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Seasonal Branch Nutrient Dynamics in Two Mediterranean Woody Shrubs with Contrasted Phenology

AuthorsMilla, Rubén; Maestro Martínez, Melchor ; Montserrat-Martí, Gabriel
KeywordsPhenology
Mediterranean climate
Phenophase-sequencers
Phenophase
Issue Date2004
PublisherOxford University Press
CitationAnnals of Botany 93(6): 671-680 (2004)
Abstract[Background and aims]: Mediterranean woody plants have a wide variety of phenological strategies. Some authors have classified the Mediterranean phanaerophytes into two broad phenological categories: phenophase-verlappers (that overlap resource-demanding activities in a short period of the year) and phenophase-sequencers (that protract resource-demanding activities throughout the year). In this work the impact of both phenological strategies on leaf nutrient accumulation and retranslocation dynamics at the level of leaves and branches was evaluated. Phenophase-overlappers were expected to accumulate nutrients in leaves throughout most of the year and withdraw them efficiently in a short period. Phenophase-sequencers were expected to withdraw nutrients progressively throughout the year, without long accumulation periods. [Methods]: To test this hypothesis, variations in phenology and leaf NPK in the crown of a phenophase-overlapper Cistus laurifolius and a phenophase-sequencer Bupleurum fruticosum were monitored monthly during 2 years. [Key Results]: Changes in nutrient concentration at the leaf level were not clearly related with the different phenologies. Nitrogen and phosphorous resorption efficiencies were lower in the phenophase-overlapper, and accumulation–retranslocation seasonality was similar in both species. Changes in the branch nutrient pool agreed with the hypothesis that the phenophase-overlapper accumulated nutrients from summer until the bud burst of the following spring, recovering a large nutrient pool during massive leaf shedding. The phenophase-sequencer did not accumulate nutrients from autumn until early spring, achieving lower nutrient recovery during spring leaf shedding. [Conclusions]: It is concluded that phenological demands influence branch nutrient cycling. This effect is easier to detect by assessing changes in the branch nutrient pool rather than changes in the leaf nutrient concentration.
Description10 páginas, 4 figuras, 3 tablas.-- El PDF es la versión post-print.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch094
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/39183
DOI10.1093/aob/mch094
ISSN0305-7364
E-ISSN1095-8290
Appears in Collections:(IPE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Milla, Maestro & Montserrat 2004.pdf830,42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.