Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/37244
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Sources of nitrogen to the riparian zone of a desert stream: implications for riparian vegetation and nitrogen retention

AuthorsSchade, J. D.; Martí, Eugènia ; Welter, J. R.; Fisher, S. G.; Grimm, N. B.
KeywordsRiparian zone
Nitrogen retention
Denitrification
Plant uptake
N mineralization
Desert stream
Issue Date2002
PublisherSpringer
CitationEcosystems 5(1) : 68-79 (2002)
AbstractRiparian zones effectively remove nitrogen (N) from water flowing through riparian soils, particularly in agricultural watersheds. The mechanism of N removal is still unclear, especially the role of vegetation. Uptake and denitrification are the two most commonly studied mechanisms. Retention of groundwater N by plant uptake is often inferred from measurements of N in net incremental biomass. However, this assumes other sources of N are not contributing to the N demand of plants. The purpose of this work was to investigate the relative importance of three sources of available N to riparian trees in a desert stream—input in stream water during floods, input during baseflow, and mineralization of N from soil organic matter. Two approaches were used; a mass balance approach in which the mass of available N from each source was estimated, and a correlational approach in which indexes of each source were compared to leaf N for individual willow trees. Total N from all sources was 396 kg ha−1 y−1, with 172 kg ha−1 y−1 from mineralization, 214 kg ha−1 y−1 from the stream during baseflow, and 9.6 kg ha−1 y−1 from floods. Leaf N was significantly related to N mineralization rates and flood inputs; it was not related to baseflow inputs. We conclude that mineralization is a major source of available N for willow trees, subsidized by input of N from floods. Baseflow inputs are most likely removed by rapid denitrification at the stream–riparian edge, while higher rates of flood supply exceed the capacity of this “filter.”
Description12 Páginas ; 5 Figuras ; 2 Tablas
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0056-6
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/37244
DOI10.1007/s10021-001-0056-6
ISSN1432-9840
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

71
checked on May 24, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

73
checked on May 26, 2022

Page view(s)

285
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.