Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/37194
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Material spiraling in stream corridors: A telescoping ecosystem model

AuthorsMartí, Eugènia ; Fisher, S. G.; Grimm, N. B.; Holmes, R. M.; Jones, J. B.
KeywordsStream
Riparian
Disturbance
Nutrients
Hyporheic
Hydrology
Telescoping ecosystem
Issue Date1998
PublisherSpringer
CitationEcosystems 1(1) : 19-34 (1998)
AbstractStream ecosystems consist of several subsystems that are spatially distributed concentrically, analogous to the elements of a simple telescope. Subsystems include the central surface stream, vertically and laterally arrayed saturated sediments (hyporheic and parafluvial zones), and the most distal element, the riparian zone. These zones are hydrologically connected; thus water and its dissolved and suspended load move through all of these subsystems as it flows downstream. In any given subsystem, chemical transformations result in a change in the quantity of materials in transport. Processing length is the length of subsystem required to ‘‘process’’ anamount of substrate equal to advective input. Long processing lengths reflect low rates of material cycling. Processing length provides the length dimension of each cylindrical element of the telescope and is specific to subsystem (for example, the surface stream), substrate (for instance, nitrate), and process (denitrification, for example). Disturbance causes processing length to increase. Processing length decreases during succession following disturbance. The whole stream-corridor ecosystem consists of several nested cylindrical elements that extend and retract, much as would a telescope, in response to disturbance regime. This telescoping ecosystem model (TEM) can improve understanding of material retention in running water systems; that is, their ‘‘nutrient filtration’’ capacity.We hypothesize that disturbance by flooding alters this capacity in proportion to both intensity of disturbance and to the relative effect of disturbance on each subsystem.We would expect more distal subsystems (for example, the riparian zone) to show the highest resistance to floods. In contrast, we predict that postflood recovery of functions such as material processing (that is, resilience) will be highest in central elements and decrease laterally. Resistance and resilience of subsystems are thus both inversely correlated and spatially separated. We further hypothesize that cross-linkages between adjacent subsystems will enhance resilience of the system as a whole. Wholeecosystem retention, transformation, and transport are thus viewed as a function of subsystem extent, lateral and vertical linkage, and disturbance regime.
Description16 páginas ; 10 figuras
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100219900003
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/37194
DOI10.1007/s100219900003
ISSN1432-9840
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

240
checked on Jul 4, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

219
checked on Jun 28, 2022

Page view(s)

297
checked on Jul 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.