English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/36634
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndreu Puyal, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorMarín Velázquez, Juan Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-08T12:41:11Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-08T12:41:11Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationActa horticulturae 658: 605-609 (2004)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0567-7572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/36634-
dc.descriptionISHS Acta Horticulturae 658: I International Symposium on Rootstocks for Deciduous Fruit Tree Species. 6 Pag., 2 Fig. The definitive version is available at: http://www.actahort.org/es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe establishment of new in vitro cultures is often a difficult task due to low growth of initial explants. The explant has to adapt to the new nutritional and environmental conditions, in addition to the surface-disinfection process. Since the explant origin plays an important role, in this work, the effect of the origin of the explants (micropropagated or conventionally propagated plants) in both establishment and multiplication of the in vitro cultures has been studied. While Adesoto 101 (Prunus insititia) shows interesting features as a rootstock, it has a poor rooting ability by cuttings, what makes micropropagation the method of choice. Explants (axillary buds), taken from plants previously micropropagated, were compared to those from conventionally propagated plants. Field-grown and framegrown plants were used as explant source. Three culture media, widely used for fruit trees, were compared for both establishment and multiplication of the cultures: Murashige y Skoog (1962), Woody Plant Medium (Lloyd and McCown, 1981) and Quoirin and Lepoivre (1977). These media were supplemented with sucrose (3%) and Difco-Bacto Agar (0.7 %). Best results during establishment were obtained with explants from micropropagated plants grown either in the frame or in the field. Plants were severely pruned to form hedges, however field growing affected negatively the establishment of new in vitro cultures compared to frame growing. The multiplication rate of new cultures was positively affected by previous in vitro micropropagation of mother plants, while the multiplication rate of cultures originated from plants propagated by cuttings decreased noticeably. Culture medium composition had a different effect depending on the micropropagation phase. While WP gave the best results during establishment, MS, with a higher mineral salts concentration, induced the highest multiplication rate.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been funded in part by grants AGF98-0277-C4-01 and AGL2001- 2414-C04-01 both from CICYT, and CONSI+D-DGA P012/2001es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInternational Society for Horticultural Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjecttissue culturees_ES
dc.subjectcuttingses_ES
dc.subjectenvironment effectes_ES
dc.subjectculture medium compositiones_ES
dc.titleMicropropagation enhances in vitro establishment and multiplication of new cultures from field grown plants of ‘Adesoto 101’ (Prunus insititia) rootstockes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.actahort.org/books/658/658_91.htmes_ES
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MarinJ_ActaHort_2004.pdf34,8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.