English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/35316
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Strategic Mass Killings

AuthorsEsteban, Joan CSIC ORCID ; Morelli, Massimo; Rohner, Dominic
KeywordsMass killings
Civil war
Natural resources
Intensity of conflict
Group size
Issue Date12-Apr-2010
CitationUFAE and IAE Working Papers; 826.10
AbstractSince World War II there have been about fifty episodes of large-scale mass killings of civilians and massive forced displacements. They were usually meticulously planned and independent of military goals. We provide a model where conflict onset, conflict intensity and the decision to commit mass killings are all endogenous, with two main goals: (1) to identify the key variables and situations that make mass killings more likely to occur; and (2) to distinguish conditions under which mass killings and military conflict intensity reinforce each other from situations where they are substitute modes of strategic violence. We predict that mass killings are most likely in societies with large natural resources, significant proportionality constraints for rent sharing, low productivity and low state capacity. Further, massacres are more likely in a civil than in an interstate war, as in the latter group sizes matter less for future rents. In non polarized societies there are asymmetric equilibria with only the larger group wanting to engage in massacres. In such settings the smaller group compensates for this by fighting harder in the first place. In this case we can talk of mass killings and fighting efforts to be substitutes. In contrast, in polarized societies either both or none of the groups can be ready to do mass killings in case of victory. Under the "shadow of mass killings" groups fight harder. Hence, in this case massacres and fighting are complements. We also present novel empirical results on the role of natural resources in mass killings and on what kinds of ethnic groups are most likely to be victimized in massacres and forced resettlements, using group level panel data.
DescriptionJEL code: C72, D74.-- Trabajo presentado a: "Conflict and Cooperation Conference" celebrada en USA en 2011; "APET 2011 - Association for Public Economy Theory" celebrado en Tailandia; "Political Economy and Development" celbrado en Francia en 2010; "1st Zurich Workshop on the Economics of Conflict" celebrado en Suiza en 2010; "MOVE - Urrutia Elejalde Workshop on Information, Dynamics and Political Decisions Making" celebrado en España en 2010.
Publisher version (URL)http://pareto.uab.es/wp/2010/82610.pdf
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/35316
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Informes y documentos de trabajo
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
82610.pdf307,13 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.