Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/3328
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

The determinants of gene order conservation in yeasts

AuthorsPoyatos, Juan F.; Hurst, Laurence D.
KeywordsEvolution
Genome studies
Genetics
Issue Date5-Nov-2007
PublisherBioMed Central
CitationGenome Biology 2007, 8:R233
Abstract[Background] Why do some groups of physically linked genes stay linked over long evolutionary periods? Although several factors are associated with the formation of gene clusters in eukaryotic genomes, the particular contribution of each feature to clustering maintenance remains unclear.
[Results] We quantify the strength of the proposed factors in a yeast lineage. First we identify the magnitude of each variable to determine linkage conservation by using several comparator species at different distances to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For adjacent gene pairs, in line with null simulations, intergenic distance acts as the strongest covariate. Which of the other covariates appear important depends on the comparator, although high co-expression is related to synteny conservation commonly, especially in the more distant comparisons, these being expected to reveal strong but relatively rare selection. We also analyze those pairs that are immediate neighbors through all the lineages considered. Current intergene distance is again the best predictor, followed by the local density of essential genes and co-regulation, with co-expression and recombination rate being the weakest predictors. The genome duplication seen in yeast leaves some mark on linkage conservation, as adjacent pairs resolved as single copy in all post-whole genome duplication species are more often found as adjacent in pre-duplication species.
[Conclusion] Current intergene distance is consistently the strongest predictor of synteny conservation as expected under a simple null model. Other variables are of lesser importance and their relevance depends both on the species comparison in question and the fate of the duplicates following genome duplication.
DescriptionThe electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/11/R233
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/3328
DOI10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r233
ISSN1465-6906
Appears in Collections:(CNB) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
gb-2007-8-11-r233.pdfPrincipal473,15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
gb-2007-8-11-r233-s1.pdfArchivo adicional 15,85 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

PubMed Central
Citations

28
checked on Apr 27, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

45
checked on May 14, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on May 12, 2022

Page view(s)

331
checked on May 16, 2022

Download(s)

249
checked on May 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.