Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/3054
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cava, David | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Giménez, Enrique | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gavara, Rafael | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lagarón Cabello, José María | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-02-25T10:36:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-02-25T10:36:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings May 1-5 2005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/3054 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article reports on preliminary studies of several comparative packaging properties between polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packaging films and biodegradable biopolymers such as polycarpolactone (PCL), polylacticacid (PLA), amorphous PLA (aPLA), and polyhydroxyalcanoates copolymer with 8 mol% valeriate (PHBV) and of some nanobiocomposites, in terms of thermal and retorting resistance (thermal humid processes) and oxygen, water vapor, aroma, and solvent barrier by means of time-resolved synchrotron radiation, FT-IR and direct permeation methods. This work suggests that while PHBV can easily withstand retorting and shows excellent water and aroma (limonene and linalool) barriers compared with PET, its solvent resistance (toluene and ethanol) and oxygen barrier properties are poorer. First trials with compression molded food contact complying nanobiocomposites of PCL and aPLA show enhanced oxygen barrier but not sufficient, as yet, to outperform high-oxygen-barrier grades of PET film. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 235434 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 2459 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Society of Plastics Engineers | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodegradable thermoplastics | en_US |
dc.subject | Barrier properties | en_US |
dc.subject | Nanobiocomposites | en_US |
dc.subject | Food packaging | en_US |
dc.subject | PET | en_US |
dc.subject | PCL | en_US |
dc.subject | PLA | en_US |
dc.subject | PHBcoV | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative performance and barrier properties of biodegradable thermoplastics and nanobiocomposites vs. PET for food packaging applications | en_US |
dc.type | artículo | en_US |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | es_ES |
item.openairetype | artículo | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IATA) Comunicaciones congresos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Laga2005.pdf | 229,92 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
378
checked on 19-abr-2024
Download(s)
1.093
checked on 19-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.