Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Statistics||SHARE CORE MendeleyBASE||
|Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE|
Case-crossover analysis of air pollution health effects: a systematic review of methodology and application
|Authors:||Carracedo-Martínez, Eduardo; Taracido, Margarita; Tobías, Aurelio CSIC ORCID|
|Publisher:||National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)|
|Citation:||Environmental Health Perspectives 118(8): 1173-1182 (2010)|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND: Case-crossover is one of the most used designs for analyzing the health-related effects of air pollution. Nevertheless, no one has reviewed its application and methodology in this context.|
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of case-crossover (CCO) designs used to study the relationship between air pollution and morbidity and mortality, from the standpoint of methodology and application.
DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: A search was made of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.Reports were classified as methodologic or applied. From the latter, the following information was extracted: author, study location, year, type of population (general or patients), dependent variable(s), independent variable(s), type of CCO design, and whether effect modification was analyzed for variables at the individual level.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The review covered 105 reports that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 24 addressed methodological aspects, and the remainder involved the design's application. In the methodological reports, the designs that yielded the best results in simulation were symmetric bidirectional CCO and time-stratified CCO. Furthermore, we observed an increase across time in the use of certain CCO designs, mainly symmetric bidirectional and time-stratified CCO. The dependent variables most frequently analyzed were those relating to hospital morbidity; the pollutants most often studied were those linked to particulate matter. Among the CCO-application reports, 13.6% studied effect modification for variables at the individual level.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CCO designs has undergone considerable growth; the most widely used designs were those that yielded better results in simulation studies: symmetric bidirectional and time-stratified CCO. However, the advantages of CCO as a method of analysis of variables at the individual level are put to little use.This study was supported by grant CIBERESP-MET-007 from the Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health [CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)], Spain. A.T. was funded by project PI080354 [Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS)] of the Subdirectorate-General for Research Evaluation and Development and by project 200930I008 [Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)].
|Description:||10 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables.-- PMID: 20356818 [PubMed].--PMCID: PMC2920078.-- Printed version published Aug 2010.|
|Publisher version (URL):||http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901485|
|Appears in Collections:||(IDAEA) Artículos|
Files in This Item:
|Carracedo_Martinez_et_al.pdf||1,57 MB||Adobe PDF|