English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/26807
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Título

Comparison between three methods for determining flagellate abundance in natural waters

AutorMassana, Ramon ; Güde, Hans
Fecha de publicaciónjun-1991
EditorTaylor & Francis
CitaciónOphelia 33(3): 197-203(1991)
ResumenFlagellates were counted in five lakes by three different methods: live, epifluorescence, and MPN (Most Probable Number) counts. Live and epifluorescence counts always gave similar numbers. Epifluorescence counts provide the best estimate of total flagellate abundance and liver counts are useful because they give a quick and easy estimate. MPN counts always gave lower numbers than the other methods. MPN, however, are interesting because they give an indication of the physiological status of the flagellate assemblage. The effect of several food sources and different conditions of incubation of MPN were assayed. MPN were higher when the incubation most closely resembled the field situation, in our case at 10 degree C in the light
Descripción7 pages, 2 tables
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1991.10429710
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/26807
DOI10.1080/00785326.1991.10429710
ISSN0078-5326
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.