Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/26125
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Species differentiation of Sepia officinalis and Sepia hierredda (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae) based on morphological and allozyme analyses

AuthorsGuerra, Ángel CSIC ORCID; Pérez-Losada, Marcos; Rocha, Francisco; Sanjuan, A.
Issue DateApr-2001
PublisherCambridge University Press
CitationJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81(1): 271-281 (2001)
AbstractTwo taxa of commercially exploited cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis and S. hierredda, are compared for the first time on the bases of quantitative morphology and allozyme polymorphisms. Morphometric measurements and meristic counts of selected soft and hard (cuttlebone) body characters, with allozyme electrophoretic analysis are used. Samples were obtained from north-west Iberian Peninsula and Senegalese waters (West Africa). Significant differences in mantle width, arm and hectocotylus length, numbers of rows of reduced suckers on the hectocotylus and in most cuttlebone measurements were found. Canonical discriminant functions of cuttlebone measurements for males and females were calculated. Allozyme electrophoresis for 33 presumptive loci showed low levels of genetic variability and 13 diagnostic loci between the two Sepia taxa. The genetic identities (I) in pairwise comparisons of populations of both taxa were I=0·582–0·596, which are typical values for congeneric species. These congruent morphological and genetic results strongly suggest that S. officinalis and S. hierredda are different species.
Description7 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables, 2 appendix.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315401003745
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/26125
DOI10.1017/S0025315401003745
ISSN0025-3154
Appears in Collections:(IIM) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
download.pdf198,6 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on May 13, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on May 14, 2022

Page view(s)

363
checked on May 16, 2022

Download(s)

526
checked on May 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.