Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/255842
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Towards women-inclusive ecology: Representation, behavior, and perception of women at an international conference

AuthorsLupon, Anna CSIC ORCID ; Rodríguez-Lozano, Pablo; Bartrons, Mireia CSIC ORCID; Anadon-Rosell, Alba; Batalla, M.; Bernal, Susana CSIC ORCID ; Bravo, Andrea G. CSIC ORCID ; Capdevila, Pol; Cañedo-Argüelles, Miguel; Catalán, Núria; Genua-Olmedo, Ana; Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano; Feio, Maria J.; Lucati, Federica; Onandía, Gabriela; Poblador, Sílvia; Rotchés-Ribalta, Roser; Sala-Bubaré, Anna; Sánchez-Montoya, María Mar; Sebastián, Marta CSIC ORCID; Zufiaurre, Aitziber; Pastor, Ada
Issue Date2021
PublisherPlos One
CitationPLoS ONE 16(12): e0260163 (2021)
AbstractConferences are ideal platforms for studying gender gaps in science because they are important cultural events that reflect barriers to women in academia. Here, we explored women’s participation in ecology conferences by analyzing female representation, behavior, and personal experience at the 1st Meeting of the Iberian Society of Ecology (SIBECOL). The conference had 722 attendees, 576 contributions, and 27 scientific sessions. The gender of attendees and presenters was balanced (48/52% women/men), yet only 29% of the contributions had a woman as last author. Moreover, men presented most of the keynote talks (67%) and convened most of the sessions. Our results also showed that only 32% of the questions were asked by women, yet the number of questions raised by women increased when the speaker or the convener was a woman. Finally, the post-conference survey revealed that attendees had a good experience and did not perceive the event as a threatening context for women. Yet, differences in the responses between genders suggest that women tended to have a worse experience than their male counterparts. Although our results showed clear gender biases, most of the participants of the conference failed to detect it. Overall, we highlight the challenge of increasing women’s scientific leadership, visibility and interaction in scientific conferences and we suggest several recommendations for creating inclusive meetings, thereby promoting equal opportunities for all participants.
DescriptionEste artículo contiene 18 páginas, 1 tabla, 5 figuras.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260163
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/255842
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0260163
ISSN1932-6203
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
(CEAB) Artículos
(EBD) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
journal.pone.0260163.pdf1,29 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Jun 7, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 19, 2023

Page view(s)

94
checked on Jun 7, 2023

Download(s)

46
checked on Jun 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.